Weather Related Deaths Versus Media Coverage

Good evening! A very quiet pattern will be bracing us over the next few days.  High pressure will be in control which means most systems will miss us.  I just checked out the latest model runs and it looks like the next real chance of any precip will occur late in the week.  Earlier I was keeping in a chance for precip on Monday but chances seem to look less and less accurate so I have removed them from the forecast.  On the good side, temperatures will eventually warm up after tomorrow.  We will see 20′s to start the week with upper 30′s to end it.  The only bad news is we should see more rain then snow by the end of the week which could cause icy roads. 

Check out this blog article from Jeff Masters.  He brings up a great point in what weather events are covered in the media but how it actually relation to weather events that cause deaths.  He points out that Heat and Drought cause the most deaths followed closely by Severe weather and winter weather.  Hurricanes and Tropical storms only make of 1.5% of weather related deaths (prior to Katrina) yet are predominantly the most covered.  I think he really brings up some great points

 

 

Also, check out this slide show of pictures of crazy weather across the world. 

Have a great evening! Meteorologist Kristen Connolly

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by kconnolly on February 28, 2009

Thunder Snow

I’m sure some of you in Wausau and surrounding areas heard the thunder and saw lightning when the snow came through yesterday afternoon.  I was out actually taking a snow measurement when all of a sudden the sky just lit up…then bang!!!  It was pretty awesome.  I ran inside and looked on good old Doppler 9000 and saw sure enough a couple lightning strikes right over Wausau.  I wish I had been filming.  Well instead I decided to find a couple videos on the Internet with Thunder snow in other areas.

Check out the links…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBUYmpnjob8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OHetw29o_A&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrt9VmF75kQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p3GctX2peE

Meteorologist Brian Niznansky

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by bniznansky on February 27, 2009

Snow Totals, Viewer Pics, Model for Flakes, FAA Weather Issues and Flood Outlook

The snow rolled in just in time for the eveningcommute last night! We even had thunder snow and lighting strikes in a few of the bands.  I was coming home from errands and was quite positive I had seen a lightning strike and when I arrived home I checked to make sure I wasn’t imagining it!

Here is some of the snowfall totals.  The average across most of area seemed to be about 4 inches.

Gile 9.5″

Tomahawk 6.0″

Shawano 5.6″

Phillips 5.0″

Elcho 4.7″

New London 4.2″

Merrill 4.1″

Wausau 4.0″

I thought this picture was so adorable taken by a viewer in Rhinelander.  You can see the squirrel has two sunflower seeds sticking out of his mouth.  It makes him look like a beaver.

This pic is from Mrs. Wilhelm’s First Grade Class at Lincoln Elementary.  Tulips are just beginning to break out before all the snow we saw yesterday afternoon to cover them up again!

Scientiest have created a computer model to recreate the ssymetical shapes of snowflakes.  It has taken two years for two mathematicians to create the program.  One is from University of Wisconsin in Madison the other from University of California, Davis.  The model could eventually help to forecast the amount of water in a snowflake. 

Consilidation seems to be everything these days now it is effecting the FAA.  Currently 81 meteorologists are stationed at 24 centers all across the country and help to work with the controlers at their center.  The newly proposed idea would eliminate those positions at have only two national centers.  This would eliminate experitse of center area from meteorolgosits who are familiar with their local weather patterns.

For the first time this year the spring flood outlook is out.  Right now it looks like across our area we shouldnt have have problems in the near future. 

I hope you all have a great Friday! As always becareful on the snow covered roadways.

Meteorologsit Kristen Connolly

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by kconnolly on February 27, 2009

Snow Update..

What looked to be a quick hitter earlierthis evening is turning out to be a pre-longed snow event for most.  Thunder-snow this afternoon brought a heavy burst of snow to most of the area…then the snow tapered off for most of you south of Wausau.  At around 6:00 p.m. it looked like things could be winding down with a pocket of dry air.  However on the backside of the low, another area of snow has developed to the west.  Light to Moderate snow will continue this evening, especially from Marathon to Clark County and North.  Additional accumulations of 2 to 4 inches will be possible bringing snow totals to around 4 to 8 inches with locally higher amounts.  Much lighter totals are expected south of Stevens Point and Marshfield.  Be Safe Out there tonight..

Meteorologist Brian Niznansky

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by bniznansky on February 26, 2009

Big Snowstorm, AGW list

We are still tracking what could be the biggest snowstorm of the winter season. Considering that we broke the record for all time record monthly snowfall back in December you would think the biggest single storm was already in the books. On the contrary, the heaviest single snowstorm in Wausau was only 7.3 inches (a record) on the 30th of December. Most of the snow in December came in 1 to 4 inch increments. The latest projections for today’s snowstorms indicate around 5 to 7inches for Wausau with as much as 9 or 10 inches in some areas south of Marathon county. In the northwoods the snowfall will be lighter – ranging from 2 inches in Iron, Ashland, and northern Vials counties to 6 inches along highway 64. Snow will begin around mid-afternoon and contiinue through midnight. There could still be some trouble after midnight as we will see a gusty north wind of 15 to 25 mph causing blowing and drifting snow in open areas.

After the storm it looks like calm but cold weather for the weekend. High temps will be in the upper teens to around 20 from Friday through Sunday. There could be a few flurries on Saturday, otherwise dry weather is expected through Monday. On Tuesday of next week we could have some light snow and another stronger storm could bring some sleet or snow next Thrusday.

AGW List

I think I will have to call it quits for the AGW list. That is, unless I get a lot of feedback from readers imploring me to keep it up. Why the end? There are a couple of reasons. First of all, it is hard to keep up. The headlines are coming faster and faster. Not only do AGW theorists predict that devastating AGW is coming faster than ever but that it will be worse than ever. Second of all, the predictions keep getting more apocalyptic. It is hard to add to the list when such sweeping statements are made. The death of almost all life on earth basically covers…well, it covers everything. Why list individual species when they will almost all be gone – according to some predictions. Sure there are some interesting predictions  – such as “more obesity” (which begs the question – how are people going to be obese when there will be no animals, plants, or food what-so-ever?) and that the earth “will literally be torn apart”, but these come a fewer and far between. This article from Newscientist today “How to survive the coming century” basically sticks a fork in the AGW list by really laying the smack down. Here are a few quotes:

“the ramifications for life on Earth are so terrifying that many scientists contacted for this article preferred not to contemplate them”

“and there are the ones who tell us to run for the hills because we’re all doomed”

“many of the places where people live and grow food would no longer be suitable for either”

“Glacial retreat will dry Europe’s rivers from the Danube to the Rhine, with similar effects in mountainous regions including the Peruvian Andes, and the Himalayan and Karakoram ranges, which as result will no longer supply water to Afghanistan, Pakistan, China, Bhutan, India and Vietnam.”

“only a fraction of the planet will be habitable”

“Large chunks of Earth’s biodiversity would vanish because species won’t be able to adapt quickly enough to higher temperatures, lack of water, loss of ecosystems, or because starving humans had eaten them.”

“the most terrifying prospect of a world warmed by 4 °C is that it may be impossible to return to anything resembling today’s varied and abundant Earth. Worse still, most models agree that once there is a 4 °C rise, the juggernaut of warming will be unstoppable, and humanity’s fate more uncertain than ever.”

So these statements are broad and sweeping and cover the most dire outcomes. It would be harder and harder to update the list, when it has already been predicted that nearly all the fish, plants, and animals, are already predicted to die. The one thing that bothers me is using the word impossible, when referring to “recovering” from climate change. The earth has been both much hotter (no ice whatsoever) and colder (almost completely covered in ice) and yet by some miracle, life survived and thrived. Even if all the ice melted (like the last time millions of years ago) why would it be irreversible this time around? What is so special now that makes things “impossible” and “irreversible”. These are terms we hear thrown around quite often by climate scientists nowadays but are generally quite rare in science as a whole. Most scientists are very careful to avoid such terms. It is part of what makes a good scientist. You will notice the IPCC never says any prediction is guaranteed (100%). They always give a percentage – a confidence level.

In any case, this will likely be the end of official updates for the AGW list. I will still cover the topic from time-to-time and we might be able to learn a few things by dredging it up again in the future. But I think the statement that AGW will be so bad so as to be unspeakable basically covers everything.

I will be gone tomorrow but will be back on Monday. I plan on covering some of the positive trends with regards to cutting pollution and protecting the planet. If I forget, someone remind me.

Lastly, how about a couple of nice pictures. Wait, first I should ask if most of the pictures are showing up ok. On my day off last week I took a look at some of the past articles and a couple of the pics were not in the articles. I saved the blog entry and headed out the door without actually checking the WAOW blog section to see how it actually showed up. It made me feel sorry for the viewers who sent them in. I said “lookat this great picture” and then it was just a white box with an x in it. First a picture of a “Snowfake”. This is the result of a mathematical project to accurately simulatethe creation of a snowflake from water molecules. Looks like they have it figured out. Next are two pictures from Carl Wohlbier from Stevens Point. The first is a picture of a beautiful red fox living in the Schmeeckle Reserve. The second is an artistic pattern of frost on the window pane. Have a good Thursday! Meteorologist Justin Loew.

 

Posted under AGW, Viewer pictures, Winter Weather

This post was written by jloew on February 26, 2009

Tags: , , ,

Bad Timing…

    The upcoming storm system will likely have some bad timing, arriving during the busiest hours of the day.  Winter Storm Warnings are posted for the entire area.  Most locations will pick up 4 to 8 inches of snow, with locally higher amounts possible for communities with in 30 miles north or south of highway 29.

    Where this heavy band of snow sets up is still in question.  This will be a fast developing and fast moving storm system.  Until things develop early tomorrow, we will not know for sure where this heavy band of snow sets up.  Snowfall totals will fall off dramatically south of the heavy snow.  Adams, Juneau, and Waushara counties may see more in the way of ice than snow.  Again the exact track can still change so stay up with the forecast.

  The biggest concern with this system is the timing…

The latest update on the storm’s most reliable forecast model is outputting around a half an inch of liquid between 3:00 and 7:00p.m.  That would be good for 6 inches of snow during that time frame.  Snowfall rates could reach 2 inches per hour at times.  Please plan accordingly and drive safe if you have to drive at all.  We are used to Winter Storms, but given the time and intensity, this could end up being a big one.

Meteorologist Brian Niznansky

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by bniznansky on February 25, 2009

Heavier Snowfall, AGW News

As forecast, some light freezing rain and sleet moved through Northcentral Wisconsin this morning. I got word of multiple serious accidents on area highways. If there is one thing you should be extra wary of, it is freezing rain. I suspect some people think light freezing rain is not so bad, but when it comes to icy roads, it doesn’t matter how heavy it is, you have to drive slow. In contrast, it will probably be easier to drive through the heavy snow late tomorrow. Snow is a little easier to gauge. Ice is less visible. The good news is that temps will rise above freezing today and the precipitation is pretty much done. Driving home from work or school this afternoon will be much safer.

Now on to Thursday’s storm. It looks like snow will develop around mid afternoon and continue through early evening before ending a bit before midnight. A WINTER STORM WATCH has been issued for the entire Newsline 9 viewing area. It will move further north than previously forecast so 4 to 8 inches is possible in some locations, mainly in central Wisconsin – along the highway 10 corridor. Around Wausau and Marathon county I am now expecting 3 to 4 inches. In the far north about 1 to 3 inches is likely. Be sure to catch Brian Niznansky’s forecast tonight for any refinements to the snow forecast. After the storm it looks like colder weather for the weekend and then a rebound next week. A couple more significant storms could move through the Midwest around mid to late next week.

AGW News:

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory – a new satellite designed to better track carbon dioxide in the atmosphere – did not make it to orbit yesterday. One portion of the structure did not separate shortly after lift-off and it ended up crashing over Antarctica. Here is an article written a few days ago describing what it was supposed to do. It is sad to see it crash. It is a large monetary and scientific loss. Wherever you fall on the spectrum of AGW (total environmental destruction vs. nothing to worry about), better data would help make better decisions in the future. One of the interesting things I found out with this episode is that climatologists studying AGW do not know where a large percentage of atmospheric carbon dioxide ends up. There is a “sink” of carbon dioxide somewhere in the biosphere and it has a large effect on carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere. Given this and other unknowns (future fossil fuel usage, instability of the climate models, etc.) I am surprised to see so many people to speak with such certainty about what the climate will be like 100 years from now. People who don’t subscribe to the mainstream AGW line, are often labelled as a “tool of big oil”, or a “denier”, or even an “environmental terrorist”. Perhaps some of you saw the recent comment in the blog describing everyone who reads this as “moronic” and me displaying “crass ignorance”. This is a typical attack against anyone who explores the complex issues revolving around AGW, including media portrayals. Environmental Armageddon is on the way – No questions asked – Believe it or you are an idiot. If this was true then there would be no need to launch a new weather satellite to learn more about the carbon cycle – right?

I think it is good to ask questions, if we want a prosperous future, because a lot of policy changes will come from AGW predictions.  Otherwise we could all just join the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement, and get it overwith. Some things that are needed:

  • Better fossil fuel usage predictions. In order to run a modern climate model you have to also predict how much fossil fuel will be used by human society. As we see from the latest economic downturn, this is a difficult thing to do. If you read my “Concrete Life” series you know that I figured we would be extremely lucky if the price of gas dropped below $3.00 per gallon. Right now it is at $2.00 and yet the world is using less of it. Most of the extreme AGW predictions of complete environmental destruction rely on greatly increasing “business as usual” fossil fuel usage for the next hundred years. This is very unlikely. It is something that needs to be revamped for the next round of IPCC reports.
  • Model performance. Contrary to popular belief, the global climate models have not been perfect at predicting the average temperature of the earth for the last ten years. We were supposed to have been somewhat warmer by now. Improving the models should be a near term goal. If working on better climate models displays “crass ignorance” then I am guilty.
  • How will AGW policies affect human society and the economy? I don’t think is is a bad thing (“moronic”) to make sure we fine tune our policies to ensure near term prosperity while protecting the future climate and environment. Scary headlines lead to panic and poor decision-making. As I have mentioned previously, putting most of our current energy supply off limits before having cleaner alternatives in place could lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy of food shortages and blackouts. I am much more worried about what people will do in the near term without hot water, gas, and electricity than what will happen if the temperature of the earth rises a couple degrees over the next 100 years.

On a positive note, a group of economists claim it will only cost 400 billion dollars to save the environment from AGW if we invest it in green technology this year get these projects running in full capacity by the end of next year. That is not too bad, compared to other estimates that AGW will cost society trillions and it will take trillions to fix things. As you know, I am a big promoter of electric vehicles and alternative energy and I am glad to see more calls for investment. That way we can ensure a stable future with alternative energy.

On the topic of alternative energy and electric vehicles, here is a long article about the new zero-emission city being built in Dubai. The artist conceptions should look cool. I hope they succeed. They plan on most of the transportation being taken care of by electric pod vehicles. Also, Samsung is releasing a new solar powered phone (at least partially solar powered). This is a new trend – people are demanding more energy efficient electronics. Some of the green technology is even being built in Wisconsin. A new ultracapacitor design and manufacturing business is opening up in Madison – Wisconsin!

On the solar front, even though the economy and alternative energy market is getting rocky, Applied Materials is still banking on good solar business in the future. Also, solar panel prices have gone down over the last few years. Maybe we will soon be able to afford them on our homes.

Have a good Wednesday! Meteorologist Justin Loew.

Posted under AGW, Alternative Energy, Winter Weather

This post was written by jloew on February 25, 2009

Tags: , , , , ,

Siren Or No Siren…

The Town Board of Weston is debating whether to install a new Severe Weather Siren or buy each of the over 300 households a N.O.A.A. weather radio instead.  They are asking local residents for input. 

The Board estimates that a new siren would cost as much as $15,000.  If the board were to purchase a $35 weather alert radio for each the town’s households, the cost would be around $10,500.  So the weather radio approach is surprisingly a cheaper option.

I guess my input would be that any enhancement to a weather alert system would be great, but there are pros and cons for each approach.

First, Most people are already familiar with the weather siren….once you here it you know you should seek shelter.  It is a practice we are all used to.  Yet sometimes it can be easy to sleep right through a warning.

N.O.A.A.  Weather Radios are very nice and reliable.  Weather bulletins are broadcast on the radio once they are issued directly from the National Weather Service….very fast!!  You can set your radio alarm only for specific weather alerts…for example a Tornado Warning or Flood Warning.  The Weather Radio will provide you with updates and locations of concern throughout the event.  One downfall with the radio solution is the possibility of having it turned off or not with you during a time of concern.  I find it very unlikely that people will carry the radio like a cell phone….to a picnic or sporting event…or even when you are doing work outside.  At least with the siren you know it will always be heard. 

Either way, I think is great the the Town Board is looking into enhancing people’s safety.

Meteorologist Brian Niznansky

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by bniznansky on February 24, 2009

Help Name the Space Station, Satellite Falls

This blog entry is going to be more centered around some space news. 

First off a 280 million dollar spacecraft had a glich this morning shortly after blasting off from Vandenberg AF Base in California.  The Satellite fell into the ocean near Antarctica not long after the 4:55 am launch. 

This was the first satellite exclusively built to track the carbon dioxide levels on earth and how we are effecting the levels.  The process has been eight years in the making.  Currently scientists rely on 282 land based stations and flight instrument aircraft to monitor levels.  To read more about the crash click here.

Next….

You, yes you can be apart of naming a room at the Space Station.  You can vote on a name of ISS new Node 3 module.  Some of the suggestions are Earthrise, Legacy, Serenity or Venture.  The poles will close on March 20th.  The new room will launch towards the Space Station late this year.  To participate you can click here. This is the second time that the agency has solicited outside help.  The name will be announced April 28th at Kennedy Space Center in Florida!

Last but not least….

Overnight we will see a wintry mix of precip mainly in the north.  This could cause some slick roads tomorrow morning.  Secondly, we are keeping our eye off to a strong storm that could have the possibility of 6″+ come Thursday.  Again this system is a few days out but something to be watched because latest model runs want to continue to move the track more north which means heavier snow for us.  Stay tuned….

Have a great night! Meteorologist Kristen Connolly

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by kconnolly on February 24, 2009

Long Range Outlooks, Office Contest

We are still watching a couple of storm systems that could cause some trouble in the area this week. The first is a weak storm system moving through after midnight tonight. It could produce some light snow and freezing rain. Any precipitation will be quite light but it doesn’t take much freezing rain to cause trouble on the roadways. As far as snowfall, there could be up to an inch in the Northwoods from late tonight through tomorrow morning.

 

The second storm could be a bit more significant. We are still tracking an arctic cold front that will move through on Thursday afternoon. If it links up with a storm system coming up from the plains then we could have enough snow to prompt some advisories and warnings. Right now I am forecasting 1 to 3 inches with the heaviest likely in the southern half of the area – south of Wausau. After the storm moves through temps will be 10 to 15 degrees below normal from Friday through Sunday.

 

Looking ahead to next week it looks like we will have some active early March weather with a couple significant storms developing in the mid-section of the country. It is still too early to say whether any of these will affect Northcentral Wisconsin or whether we will have rain or snow.

 

Even farther out in the future, well, the CPC has released the long range monthly outlooks. There is not much to see in our area. The computer models are forecasting equal chances of above or below normal temperatures and the same for above or below normal precipitation from March all the way through the summer. All I hope is that we get enough precipitation. We have experienced 6 years in a row of below normal precipitation. I would say we are due for a “wet” year.

 

A little update on the forecasting contests here in the weather office. Kristen won when trying too predict the number of below zero low temperatures remaining in the winter (from January 5th onward, when the contest started). It turns out that we have experienced 26 nights with below zero low temperatures (and we might have a couple more before Spring). Kristen forecast 22 night below zero and was the closest. Brian forecast 21 and I forecast 20. I am still in the running for the first 6 inch snowfall of the winter…since we have not had one yet. If we end up with a 6 inch snowstorm before the end of the cold season I will take home the win. I am thinking our next forecast will be how many days in March will have high temps of 50 or higher.

Posted under Winter Weather

This post was written by jloew on February 24, 2009

Tags: ,