The possible record low we had been expecting for this morning did not materialize. It is the peril of weather forecasting. Mother nature, the weather, is chaotic and doesn’t always follow the script. A weak weather system moving through Iowa had enough moisture moved close enough to Northcentral Wisconsin to bring some heazy clouds. Low temps in the central and southern part of the area only dropped into the mid to upper 30s. In the far north where skies remainded clear low temps dropped into the 20s, as low as 23 in Land O’ Lakes!
The weather doesn’t always follow “the script” in the present day, but it might in the future, to a degree. As you know in the AGW theory and debate, it is claimed that humans are in near complete control of the climate and are making the earth warmer. While I have always held that we do affect the climate to some degree, I don’t think we control it as competely as mainstream AGW theorists do.
Because of the grave threat of environmental apocalypse heralded by some environmentalists and climatologists, some forward thinking individuals have been designing ways to help cool the planet. One proposed geo-engineering scheme involves putting sulfur dioxide into the upper atmosphere. Sulfur dioxide reflects sunlight and thus could cool the planet by a degree or two. It is the same thing that happens when a large volcano erupts and sends ash (and sulfur dioxide) high into the atmosphere. Researchers in England are testing out a balloon-and-hose method to implement this geo-engineering idea.
I don’t like the idea of putting stuff into the air in order to reflect sunlight and cool the planet (I would rather just take the carbon out of the air if it came to that). However, if the climate “goes to hell in a hand-basket” (however unlikely), then it makes sense to at least investigate mitigation methods, to see if it is technologically and economically feasible. In the big scheme of things, I actually would not mind having more control over the weather and I think it is our destiny. We have already created small climate controlled environments – everything from houses to stadiums. Next up is the whole earth. While I like exciting changeable weather as much as the next guy, it can be quite dangerous. The tornadoes that hit Alabama and Missouri this year killed people. If we could have stopped those tornadoes before they hit populated areas, we should have. Hurricanes, lightning, droughts, and floods kill thousands of people around the world every year. We have done a lot to protect ourselves from these threats and the next step will be to move into the air and alter the source. This might not seem very “environmental”, I know. I am quite the naturalist myself, but I enjoy life as well, and mother nature could care less if I live or die. I care. I would support environmentally friendly methods of altering dangerous weather.
Have a pleasant weekend! Meteorologist Justin Loew.
Posted under AGW, Environment, Records
This post was written by jloew on September 16, 2011

Cool the planet? I think our area needs some warming. Maybe they could figure out a way to move the hot air to cold areas and vice versa, the lack of strong temp gradients would get rid of a lot of severe weather li8ke tornados.
First of all, sulfur dioxide, might work to cool the planet, but when combined with water (as it will inevitably in the upper atmosphere) becomes acid rain. So great, we may not burn up, but everything will corrode, and mess up the ecosystem anyway. Secondly, there is something called HAARP, high activity auroral research project, based in Gakona Alaska. We already do control the weather with this thing, we have for years, and it puts new light on the recent freak earthquake in DC(think seismic weaponry), the resultant hurricane irene, and hurricane katrina, as well as the tsunami that took out fukishima. All I have to ask is why do we keep having to play God with the weather. The solution is very simple, live with the Earth, as opposed to trying to improve upon her and get away with a lifestyle that perhaps we shouldnt and really isnt the best thing for us anyway. I am reminded of the story of Atlantis. They tried to play God, and disapeared into the ocean in a single night of misfortune. We keep tinkering with the weather and climate, we may just find out first hand what really sank atlantis.
That is an interesting idea for “weather-engineering” and it would likely decrease severe weather. I am not sure how it would be exactly accomplished, but an interesting idea, none-the-less.
Here is an old blog post where I talked a little about HAARP and provided a link to another article from a person who toured the facility: http://addins.waow.com/blogs/weather/2009/08/you-cant-play-this-haarp